The problem of the basing relation

Synthese 190 (14):2943-2957 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In days past, epistemologists expended a good deal of effort trying to analyze the basing relation—the relation between a belief and its basis. No satisfying account was offered, and the project was largely abandoned. Younger epistemologists, however, have begun to yearn for an adequate theory of basing. I aim to deliver one. After establishing some data and arguing that traditional accounts of basing are unsatisfying, I introduce a novel theory of the basing relation: the dispositional theory. It begins with the pedestrian observation that beliefs stand or fall with their bases. The theory I offer is an elucidation and refinement of this thought

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-21

Downloads
362 (#55,408)

6 months
18 (#140,036)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ian Evans
University of Arizona

Citations of this work

The Basing Relation.Ram Neta - 2019 - Philosophical Review 128 (2):179-217.
Suspending is Believing.Thomas Raleigh - 2019 - Synthese (3):1-26.
Epistemic Reasons II: Basing.Kurt Sylvan - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (7):377-389.

View all 41 citations / Add more citations