Defending the Jurisdiction of the Clinical Ethicist

Journal of Clinical Ethics 25 (1):20-31 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay I suggest that the bioethics profession’s jurisdiction over healthcare ethics consultation is in need of reinforcement. I argue that as the profession becomes more successful, competitors will challenge the profession to justify its ethical claims and ask whose ethics the profession represents. This challenge will come more quickly as the profession tries to influence the ethics of healthcare organizations. I propose a method of bolstering jurisdiction that will make the profession less vulnerable to challenge in the future.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Response to Callahan and Winslade.John H. Evans - 2014 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 25 (1):41-42.
The Birth of Clinical Ethics Consultation as a Profession.Jeffrey P. Spike - 2014 - American Journal of Bioethics 14 (1):20-22.
Is There an Ethics for Historians?Alan Tapper - 2009 - Studies in Western Australian History 26:16-36.
Clinical Ethicists: Consultants or Professionals?William J. Winslade - 2014 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 25 (1):36-40.
The Uncommon Ethics of the Medical Profession: A Response to My Critics.Rosamond Rhodes - 2022 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 31 (2):212-219.
Educating Ourselves and Educating Patients.Daniel Maison - 2001 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (1):97-98.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-22

Downloads
6 (#1,483,069)

6 months
5 (#710,905)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Evans
Chungbuk National University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references