Politicians, governed versus non-governed interest groups and rent dissipation

Theory and Decision 79 (1):133-149 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Government intervention often gives rise to contests and the government can influence their outcome by choosing their type. We consider a contest with two interest groups: one that is governed by a central planner and one that is not. Rent dissipation is compared under two well-known contest success functions: the generalized logit and the all-pay auction. We also consider the case in which the government can limit the size of the non-governed interest group in order to determine the scope of rent dissipation, with the goal of either increasing the rent obtained by the government or reducing the wasted resources invested in the contest.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,931

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rule-governed and contingency-governed fears.Edmund Fantino & Jay Goldshmidt - 1995 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 18 (2):299-300.
In the interest of the governed.David Lyons - 1973 - Oxford,: Clarendon Press.
In the Interest of the Governed. [REVIEW]Tziporah Kasachkoff - 1973 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 22:291-293.
The ethics of rent control.Ken Hanly - 1991 - Journal of Business Ethics 10 (3):189 - 200.
Who gains from information asymmetry?Gil S. Epstein & Yosef Mealem - 2013 - Theory and Decision 75 (3):305-337.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-06-28

Downloads
28 (#587,487)

6 months
3 (#1,044,897)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references