In defense of Taking Morality Seriously: reply to Manne, Sobel, Lenman, and Joyce [Book Review]

Philosophical Studies 168 (3):853-865 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11098-013-0216-5

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Disagreeing about how to disagree.Kate Manne & David Sobel - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (3):823-34.
Question authority: in defense of moral naturalism without clout.Jon Tresan - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 150 (2):221 - 238.
Errors upon errors: a reply to joyce.Stephen Finlay - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):535 - 547.
Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism, by David Enoch.T. Cuneo - 2012 - Mind 121 (484):1059-1064.
Enoch, David. Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism. [REVIEW]Jeff Behrends - 2012 - Review of Metaphysics 66 (1):146-148.
David Enoch, Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism: Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011, pp. 336. ISBN 978-0-19-957996-9, $75.00 Hbk. [REVIEW]David Faraci - 2012 - Journal of Value Inquiry 46 (2):259-267.
Manne on insider trading.Stephen M. Bainbridge - manuscript
Review of David Enoch, "Taking Morality Seriously: A Defense of Robust Realism". [REVIEW]Ralph Wedgwood - 2013 - Philosophical Quarterly 63 (251):389-393.
Incomplete descriptions and (reverse) Sobel sequences.Mirja Annalena Holst - 2013 - Analysis 73 (1):26-32.
The nature of moral judgements and the extent of the moral domain.Ben Fraser - 2012 - Philosophical Explorations 15 (1):1-16.
Reply to Robertson.David Sobel - 2003 - Philosophical Papers 32 (2):185-191.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-11

Downloads
142 (#134,044)

6 months
11 (#270,430)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David Enoch
Hebrew University of Jerusalem

Citations of this work

How to be impartial as a subjectivist.Emad H. Atiq - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (3):757-779.
Epistemology shmepistemology: moral error theory and epistemic expressivism.Stephen Ingram - 2018 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 61 (7):649-669.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Dispositional Theories of Value.Michael Smith, David Lewis & Mark Johnston - 1989 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 63 (1):89-174.
Subjectivism and idealization.David Sobel - 2009 - Ethics 119 (2):336-352.
Why idealize?David Enoch - 2005 - Ethics 115 (4):759-787.
Humean Constructivism in Moral Theory.James Lenman - 2010 - In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Volume 5. Oxford University Press.
Humean Constructivism in Moral Theory.James Lenman - 2010 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 5.

Add more references