Meanings of the unmarked: How'default'person reference does more than just refer

In N. J. Enfield & Tanya Stivers (eds.), Person reference in interaction: linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 97--120 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Person as subject.Dieter Sturma - 2007 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (5-6):77-100.
Inscrutability and its discontents.Vann McGee - 2005 - Noûs 39 (3):397–425.
Bootstrapping our way to samesaying.Laura Schroeter - 2012 - Synthese 189 (1):177-197.
Coreference and meaning.N. Ángel Pinillos - 2011 - Philosophical Studies 154 (2):301 - 324.
Alternative recognitionals in person reference.Tanya Stivers - 2007 - In N. J. Enfield & Tanya Stivers (eds.), Person reference in interaction: linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 73--96.
Person reference in Yucatec Maya conversation.William F. Hanks - 2007 - In N. J. Enfield & Tanya Stivers (eds.), Person reference in interaction: linguistic, cultural, and social perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 149--171.
How Proper Names Refer.Imogen Dickie - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (1pt1):43-78.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-30

Downloads
28 (#574,430)

6 months
3 (#984,719)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references