Stoichiometry and the New Biology: The Future Is Now

PLoS Biology 5:181-183 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The world is an untidy place, and the sciences—all of them—reflect this. One source of this untidiness is the relationship between levels of organization. Reducing macrolevels to microlevels—explaining the former in terms of the latter—has met with successes but has never been the whole story. In the biological sciences, there has been much attention lately to the shortcomings of reductionism on the grounds that (i) it changes the subject rather than explaining, (ii) it leads to a myopically molecular view of the biological world, and (iii) the behavior or behaviors of complex systems are often very poorly predicted based solely on their microproperties. It is just for these reasons that biologists of many stripes have called for a move away from reductionism and toward a new kind of biology for the 21st century. But what shape might this new biology take?

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-04-15

Downloads
34 (#482,981)

6 months
1 (#1,508,101)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Andrew Hamilton
Arizona State University

Citations of this work

The Limits of Reductionism in the Life Sciences.Marie I. Kaiser - 2011 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 33 (4):453-476.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references