Does It Make Sense to Be a Loyal Employee?

Journal of Business Ethics 116 (3):495-511 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Loyalty is a much-discussed topic among business ethicists, but this discussion seems to have issued in very few clear conclusions. This article builds on the existing literature on the subject and attempts to ground a definite conclusion on a limited topic: whether, and under what conditions, it makes sense for an employee to offer loyalty to his employer. The main ways in which loyalty to one’s employer can contribute to human flourishing are that it makes the employee more trustworthy and therefore more valuable as an employee; makes it easier to form authentic relationships in other areas of the employee’s life; expands the employee’s field of interests and gives her or him a richer identity; provides greater motivation for the employee’s work; makes it possible to have a greater unity in the employee’s life; improves the performance of the organization for which the employee works; contributes to the protection of valuable social institutions; and, in so far as many employees share an attitude of loyalty towards the organization which employs them, it becomes possible for this organization to become a true community. Last, but not the least, loyal relationships have an inherent value. The article also reviews the main arguments that have been offered against employee loyalty and concludes that none of them offers a reason why it would be inappropriate in all cases for an employee to be loyal to her or his employer. The force of these arguments depends on the specific attributes of the organization for which the employee works. The main conclusion of the article is that while being a loyal employee involves risk, it has the potential to contribute significantly to the employee’s fulfilment. The main challenge for employees is to identify employers who are worthy of being loyal to.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Owing loyalty to one's employer.Raymond S. Pfeiffer - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (7):535 - 543.
The Moral Significance of Employee Loyalty.Brian Schrag - 2001 - Business Ethics Quarterly 11 (1):41-66.
Employee Governance and the Ownership of the Firm.John R. Boatright - 2004 - Business Ethics Quarterly 14 (1):1-21.
The Origin and Implications of Engineers' Obligations to the Public Welfare.Jerry W. Gravander - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:443 - 455.
Whistleblowing and employee loyalty.Robert A. Larmer - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):125 - 128.
On Employee Vice.Dennis J. Moberg - 1997 - Business Ethics Quarterly 7 (4):41-60.
Corporate loyalty, does it have a future?Brian A. Grosman - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (7):565 - 568.
A defense of employee rights.Joseph R. Des Jardins & John J. McCall - 1985 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (5):367-376.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-09-13

Downloads
147 (#127,653)

6 months
15 (#166,852)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Business Ethics.Jeffrey Moriarty - 2016 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Business ethics.Alexei Marcoux - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Employer Loyalty: The Need for Reciprocity.Kemi Ogunyemi - 2014 - Philosophy of Management 13 (3):21-32.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Natural law and natural rights.John Finnis - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Moral thinking: its levels, method, and point.R. M. Hare (ed.) - 1981 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ethics.William K. Frankena - 1963 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall.
Natural Law and Natural Rights.John Finnis - 1979 - New York: Oxford University Press UK.

View all 55 references / Add more references