On bishop sentences

Natural Language Semantics 18 (1):65-78 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article offers a critical examination of Kroll’s (Natural Language Semantics 16: 359–372, 2008) arguments against Elbourne’s (Situations and individuals, 2005) treatment of bishop sentences

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/s11050-009-9051-9

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,150

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

E-Type Anaphora as NP-Deletion.Paul Elbourne - 2001 - Natural Language Semantics 9 (3):241-288.
On Bishops and Donkeys.Nicky Kroll - 2008 - Natural Language Semantics 16 (4):359-372.
Donkey Demonstratives.Barbara Abbott - 2002 - Natural Language Semantics 10 (4):285-298.
When the donkey lost its fleas: persistence, minimal situations, and embedded quantifiers. [REVIEW]Eytan Zweig - 2006 - Natural Language Semantics 14 (4):283-296.
Donkey sentences and quantifier variability.Berit Brogaard - manuscript
Crossover Situations.Daniel Büring - 2004 - Natural Language Semantics 12 (1):23-62.
Situation Pronouns in Determiner Phrases.Florian Schwarz - 2012 - Natural Language Semantics 20 (4):431-475.
Predicate logic with flexibly binding operators and natural language semantics.Peter Pagin & Dag Westerståhl - 1993 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 2 (2):89-128.
Donkey anaphora: the view from sign language (ASL and LSF).Philippe Schlenker - 2011 - Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (4):341-395.
Towards a uniform analysis of any.Robert van Rooij - 2008 - Natural Language Semantics 16 (4):297-315.
E-type interpretation without E-type pronoun: how Peirce’s Graphs capture the uniqueness implication of donkey pronouns in discourse anaphora.Chuansheng He - 2015 - Synthese 192 (4):1-20.
Donkey business.Bart Geurts - 2002 - Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (2):129-156.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
49 (#325,557)

6 months
7 (#435,412)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Elbourne
Oxford University

Citations of this work

Stoic logic and multiple generality.Susanne Bobzien & Simon Shogry - 2020 - Philosophers' Imprint 20 (31):1-36.
Descriptions.Peter Ludlow - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Donkey anaphora: the view from sign language (ASL and LSF).Philippe Schlenker - 2011 - Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (4):341-395.
Incomplete descriptions and indistinguishable participants.Paul Elbourne - 2016 - Natural Language Semantics 24 (1):1-43.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Semantics in generative grammar.Irene Heim & Angelika Kratzer - 1998 - Malden, MA: Blackwell. Edited by Angelika Kratzer.
Literal Meaning.François Récanati - 2002 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reference and generality.P. T. Geach - 1962 - Ithaca, N.Y.,: Cornell University Press. Edited by Michael C. Rea.
Descriptions.Stephen Neale - 1990 - MIT Press.

View all 19 references / Add more references