Nonlocality and Gleason's lemma. Part 2. Stochastic theories

Foundations of Physics 20 (11):1389-1397 (1990)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I derive a Gleason-type contradiction from assumptions weaker than those needed to reach a Bell inequality. By establishing the inconsistency between local realism and QM's perfect EPR-type anticorrelations, the proof fills in a gap left open by Bell arguments

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Non-realism: Deep Thought or a Soft Option?Nicolas Gisin - 2012 - Foundations of Physics 42 (1):80-85.
Gleason's theorem has a constructive proof.Fred Richman - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 29 (4):425-431.
Nonlocality Without Nonlocality.Steven Weinstein - 2009 - Foundations of Physics 39 (8):921-936.
Generalizations of Kochen and Specker's theorem and the effectiveness of Gleason's theorem.Itamar Pitowsky - 2003 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35 (2):177-194.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
78 (#214,184)

6 months
5 (#646,314)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?