Demonstratives as individual concepts

Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (4):409-466 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Using a version of situation semantics, this article argues that bare and complex demonstratives are interpreted as individual concepts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,928

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
225 (#89,634)

6 months
26 (#112,351)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Paul Elbourne
Oxford University

Citations of this work

Hopes, Fears, and Other Grammatical Scarecrows.Jacob M. Nebel - 2019 - Philosophical Review 128 (1):63-105.
Semantics and metasemantics in the context of generative grammar.Seth Yalcin - 2014 - In Alexis Burgess & Brett Sherman (eds.), Metasemantics: New Essays on the Foundations of Meaning. Oxford University Press. pp. 17-54.
No context, no content, no problem.Ethan Nowak - 2020 - Mind and Language 36 (2):189-220.

View all 44 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Ontological relativity and other essays.Willard Van Orman Quine (ed.) - 1969 - New York: Columbia University Press.
Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
Themes From Kaplan.Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.) - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press.

View all 88 references / Add more references