Vindication, Hume, and Induction

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (1):119-129 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The proponents of the ‘vindication’ or ‘pragmatic justification’ of induction have attempted to show that induction will work if any method does. This in turn serves as grounds for their claim that we have everything to gain by using induction and nothing to lose. Hence, they conclude that it is rational to use induction. Their claim that induction will work if any mehtod does is based upon the following argument:If nature is uniform, induction will work. If nature is not uniform and some other method works, the success of that method will then constitute a regularity to which induction can be successfully applied. In that case, induction will sanction the continued use of the successful method and hence will be successful as well.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Vindication, Hume, and Induction.Gary E. Jones - 1982 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (1):119 - 129.
Induction and objectivity.F. John Clendinnen - 1966 - Philosophy of Science 33 (3):215-229.
What was Hume's contribution to the problem of induction?Ruth Weintraub - 1995 - Philosophical Quarterly 45 (181):460-470.
Hume Is Not A Skeptic about Induction.Xinli Wang - 2001 - Diálogos. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Puerto Rico 36 (78):41-54.
Stove on the rationality of induction and the uniformity thesis.Michael Rowan - 1993 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44 (3):561-566.
No Need to Justify Induction Generally.Kazuyoshi Kamiyama - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 53:105-111.
A Problem for Hume's Theory of Induction.Ruth Weintraub - 2008 - Hume Studies 34 (2):169-187.
Logical and Spiritual Reflections.Avi Sion - 2008 - Geneva, Switzerland: CreateSpace & Kindle; Lulu..
Justification of Induction: Russell and Jin Yuelin. A Comparative Study.Chen Bo - 2012 - History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (4):353-378.
On probabilism and induction.John Hosack - 1991 - Topoi 10 (2):227-229.
Normativity and probable reasoning: Hume on induction.Chon Tejedor - 2011 - Daimon: Revista Internacional de Filosofía 52:15-32.
Is Hume Really a Sceptic about Induction?Tom L. Beauchamp & Thomas A. Mappes - 1975 - American Philosophical Quarterly 12 (2):119 - 129.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
31 (#515,349)

6 months
27 (#110,724)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Conjectures and Refutations.K. Popper - 1963 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 21 (3):431-434.
Introduction to Logical Theory.P. E. Strawson - 1953 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14 (2):261-262.
On failing to vindicate induction.Brian Skyrms - 1965 - Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):253-268.
The judicial decision.[author unknown] - 1962 - Philosophical Books 3 (1):21-23.

Add more references