The Declaration of Helsinki in bioethics literature since the last revision in 2013

Bioethics 38 (4):335-343 (2024)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The World Medical Association has announced that a new revision process of the Declaration of Helsinki has been started. This article will identify the criticisms that have been made in the bioethics literature, particularly since the last revision. In addition, criticisms are discussed that were made in the literature even before the last revision and have not fallen silent. The plausibility of the recommendation for a change in the Declaration of Helsinki is examined.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,100

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The 50th Anniversary of the Declaration of Helsinki: Progress but Many Remaining Challenges.J. Millum - 2013 - Journal of the American Medical Association 310 (20):2143-44.
A Call to Revise the Declaration of Helsinki’s Placebo Guidelines.Dien Ho - 2024 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 33 (1):141-142.
After helsinki: Unresolved issues in international research.Ruth Macklin - 2001 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 11 (1):17-36.
The Helsinki Declaration: why all the fuss?W. Tadd - 2000 - Nursing Ethics 7 (5):439-450.
Placebo and the helsinki declaration — What to do?Professor Bozidar Vrhovac - 2004 - Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (1):81-93.
Neonatal Pain Relief and the Helsinki Declaration.Robert S. Van Howe & J. Steven Svoboda - 2008 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (4):803-823.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-02-19

Downloads
16 (#908,545)

6 months
16 (#157,774)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references