Derrida’s Archive and Legacy to Education: Between Past and Future

In Ann Chinnery, Nuraan Davids, Naomi Hodgson, Kai Horsthemke, Viktor Johansson, Dirk Willem Postma, Claudia W. Ruitenberg, Paul Smeyers, Christiane Thompson, Joris Vlieghe, Hanan Alexander, Joop Berding, Charles Bingham, Michael Bonnett, David Bridges, Malte Brinkmann, Brian A. Brown, Carsten Bünger, Nicholas C. Burbules, Rita Casale, M. Victoria Costa, Brian Coyne, Renato Huarte Cuéllar, Stefaan E. Cuypers, Johan Dahlbeck, Suzanne de Castell, Doret de Ruyter, Samantha Deane, Sarah J. DesRoches, Eduardo Duarte, Denise Egéa, Penny Enslin, Oren Ergas, Lynn Fendler, Sheron Fraser-Burgess, Norm Friesen, Amanda Fulford, Heather Greenhalgh-Spencer, Stefan Herbrechter, Chris Higgins, Pádraig Hogan, Katariina Holma, Liz Jackson, Ronald B. Jacobson, Jennifer Jenson, Kerstin Jergus, Clarence W. Joldersma, Mark E. Jonas, Zdenko Kodelja, Wendy Kohli, Anna Kouppanou, Heikki A. Kovalainen, Lesley Le Grange, David Lewin, Tyson E. Lewis, Gerard Lum, Niclas Månsson, Christopher Martin & Jan Masschelein (eds.), International Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Springer Verlag. pp. 115-134 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

An examination of Derrida’s “constant preoccupation” with the archive, a theme he developed in most of his texts, reveals the recurring paradox underlying the tension between being both faithful and unfaithful to our legacy, our heritage - one example of aporia, of the condition of possibility as being dependent on the simultaneous necessity of a condition of impossibility. In the context of reading Derrida and focusing on his legacy, calling for an engagement of his form of reasoning and analyzing with educational issues, I propose to consider two of our most critical current educational challenges: the closing of philosophy programs and humanities at all levels, and the commodification of education under the pressure of the corporate model and money market. In the last section, I discuss two concepts fundamental in all of Derrida’s texts and in education which offer philosophers of education some powerful paradigms for a deeper understanding of those issues at stake in education: aporia, paradox and the responsibility they entail; and the related concept of à venir, to-come and its promise. “If someone knew nothing about Derrida,” and we could retain only one thing from his legacy, it would be the significance and necessity of our philosophical heritage, and the importance not to simply keep its memory, but to question its teachings.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Derrida & education.Gert Biesta & Denise Egéa-Kuehne (eds.) - 2001 - New York: Routledge.
Philosophical Remarks on Nelson Mandela’s Education Legacy.Yusef Waghid - 2014 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 46 (1):4-7.
The University and the New Humanities.Michael A. Peters - 2004 - Arts and Humanities in Higher Education 3 (1):41-57.
Hegel's legacy.Rocío Zambrana - 2012 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 50 (2):273-284.
Inventing the Educational Subject in the ‘Information Age’.Emile Bojesen - 2016 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 35 (3):267-278.
Opening: Derrida & education.D. Egéa-Kuehne & Gert Biesta - 2001 - In Gert Biesta & Denise Egéa-Kuehne (eds.), Derrida & Education. Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
1 (#1,904,823)

6 months
1 (#1,478,781)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references