Why can’t we see this controversy? Bruno Latour, Greek myths, local alternatives

Abstract

This paper proposes (once again) that a controversy has been omitted from Robert Graves’s account of how the Greek myths became an established part of the British education system. I address a question from the secondary literature on Bruno Latour: why can’t we see this controversy? Two reasons are speculatively identified.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Bruno Latour: Existenzweisen. Eine Anthropologie der Modernen.Bruno Latour & Burkhard Liebsch - 2014 - Philosophischer Literaturanzeiger 67 (4):356-366.
Bruno Latour and actor-network-theory.Bozidar Filipovic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (1):129-149.
Pandora’s hope.Bruno Latour - 1999 - Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Ontology in Heidegger and Deleuze: a comparative analysis.Gavin Rae - 2014 - Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan, an imprint of Macmillan Publishers.
Rescuing the Gorgias from Latour.Jeff Kochan - 2006 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 36 (4):395-422.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-10-13

Downloads
152 (#125,540)

6 months
59 (#80,745)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references