A “prelogical” response to the surprise exam paradox

Abstract

In this paper, I present a response to the surprise exam paradox which may be of some use to someone. It is somewhat frightening for me.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

The surprise exam paradox: a note on formulating it and a solution to it.Terence Rajivan Edward - 2019 - Ethos: Dialogues in Philosophy and Social Sciences 12 (2):181-186.
The Solution to the Surprise Exam Paradox.Ken Levy - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):131-158.
No Surprises.Ian Wells - 2019 - Erkenntnis 86 (2):389-406.
How to expect a surprising exam.Brian Kim & Anubav Vasudevan - 2017 - Synthese 194 (8):3101-3133.
Surprise, surprise: KK is innocent.Julien Murzi, Leonie Eichhorn & Philipp Mayr - 2021 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 10 (1):4-18.
Logic and the Surprise Exam Paradox.Margarita Vázquez - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 13:121-127.
The Cookie Paradox.Dylan Dodd - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 92 (2):355-377.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-09

Downloads
111 (#161,135)

6 months
52 (#88,006)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terence Rajivan Edward
University of Manchester (PhD)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references