Understanding Conceptual Impact of Scientific Knowledge on Policy: The Role of Policymaking Conditions

Minerva 60 (2):209-233 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper presents a framework to understand the impact of scientific knowledge on the policy-making process, focusing on the conceptual impact. We note the continuing dissatisfaction with the quality and effects of science-policy interactions in both theory and practice. We critique the current literature’s emphasis on the efforts of scientists to generate policy impact, because it neglects the role of ‘user’ policymaking organisations. The framework offered in the paper develops an argument about the essential role of institutional conditions of policy ‘users’ for scientific knowledge to achieve impact. The framework is informed by the reflexive institutionalist and the neo-institutionalist theoretical approaches. Its main contribution is in outlining the intra- and inter-organisational conditions of policymaking organisations, along with personal characteristics of individual policy officials that influence the likelihood of scientific knowledge to generate conceptual impact. We also offer an operationalisation of the framework. The wider relevance of the paper is in moving the focus from the activities of scientists and the incentive structure in scientific organisations to the policy user side.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Scientists as experts: A distinct role?Torbjørn Gundersen - 2018 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 69:52-59.
Can food safety policy-making be both scientifically and democratically legitimated? If so, how?Erik Millstone - 2007 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 20 (5):483-508.
Knowledge on Stage: Scientific Policy Advice.Jost Wagner & Cordula Kropp - 2010 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 35 (6):812-838.
Idealizations and scientific understanding.Moti Mizrahi - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 160 (2):237-252.
EMU and inference: what the explanatory model of scientific understanding ignores.Mark Newman - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 4 (1):55-74.
Non‐conceptual knowledge.Frank Hofmann - 2014 - Philosophical Issues 24 (1):184-208.
Science, policy, and politics: Comparing and contrasting issues in energy and the environment.Paul Gilman - 2006 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 73 (3):1001-1010.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-02-12

Downloads
13 (#1,056,248)

6 months
4 (#843,989)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations