- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
How do standard setters define materiality and why does it matter?
Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 30 (3):378-391 (2021)
Abstract
Business Ethics: A European Review, EarlyView.My notes
Similar books and articles
How do standard setters define materiality and why does it matter?Cynthia E. Clark - 2021 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 30 (3):378-391.
Mismanagement of Sustainability: What Business Strategy Makes the Difference? Empirical Evidence from the USA.Janine Maniora - 2018 - Journal of Business Ethics 152 (4):931-947.
Legitimating Transnational Standard-Setting: The Case of the International Accounting Standards Board.Burkard Eberlein & Alan Richardson - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 98 (2):217-245.
Accountability and the restraint of freedom: A deontological case for the stricter standard of corporate disclosure. [REVIEW]James J. Brummer - 1986 - Journal of Business Ethics 5 (2):155 - 164.
The Matter of Health: Rethinking the Materiality of Living Bodies.Rachel Tillman - 2018 - Proceedings of the XXIII World Congress of Philosophy 65:73-78.
Does matter really matter? Computer simulations, experiments, and materiality.Wendy S. Parker - 2009 - Synthese 169 (3):483-496.
The politics of materiality: Affective encounters in a transdisciplinary debate.Sari Irni - 2013 - European Journal of Women's Studies 20 (4):347-360.
Due Process and Standard-setting: An Analysis of Due Process in Three Canadian Accounting and Auditing Standard-setting Bodies.Alan Richardson - 2008 - Journal of Business Ethics 81 (3):679-696.
Materiality of Marble: Explorations in the Artistic Life of Stone.Alison Leitch - 2010 - Thesis Eleven 103 (1):65-77.
Global multi-stakeholder standard setters: how fragile are they?Magnus Boström & Kristina Tamm Hallström - 2013 - Journal of Global Ethics 9 (1):93-110.
Beyond dematerialization and inscription: Does the materiality of molecular models really matter?Eric Francoeur - 2000 - Hyle 6 (1):63 - 84.
Analytics
Added to PP
2021-06-14
Downloads
7 (#1,393,864)
6 months
4 (#799,214)
2021-06-14
Downloads
7 (#1,393,864)
6 months
4 (#799,214)
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
Moral imagination: implications of cognitive science for ethics.Mark Johnson - 1993 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Social intuitionists answer six questions about morality.Jonathan Haidt & Fredrik Bjorklund - 2008 - In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (ed.), Moral Psychology Vol. 2. MIT Press.
Corporate communication and impression management – new perspectives why companies engage in corporate social reporting.Reggy Hooghiemstra - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 27 (1-2):55 - 68.
A Fiduciary Argument Against Stakeholder Theory.Alexei M. Marcoux - 2003 - Business Ethics Quarterly 13 (1):1-24.
Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues.Jonathan Haidt & Craig Joseph - 2004 - Daedalus 133 (4):55-66.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-5ff6c685cb-ldh8k uwo