Romantic Love

Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):361-368 (1987)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Feminists and gay liberationists condemn romantic love as an inherently sexist and heterosexist institution which requires sexist idealizations and heterosexual desire. I argue that although romantic love in contemporary Western societies often includes sexist idealizations and heterosexual desire, those elements are not necessary constituents of the concept of romantic love. The crucial elements in romantic love are concern, admiration, the desire for reciprocation, and the passion for union, none of which require either sexist idealizations or heterosexual sexual desire.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Love Without Sex.Dana E. Bushnell - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):369-373.
Romantic Love.Carol Caraway - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 2 (1):76-96.
Romantic Love.Carol Caraway - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):361-368.
Romantic Love.Carol Caraway - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 2 (1):76-96.
Romantic Love.Carol Caraway - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):361-368.
The Philosophy of (Erotic) Love. [REVIEW]Carol Caraway - 1992 - Teaching Philosophy 15 (4):375-378.
The Unity of Romantic Love.Alan Soble - 1987 - Philosophy and Theology 1 (4):374-397.
Kierkegaard on Faith and Love.Sharon Krishek - 2009 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Love, Incorporated.Adrienne M. Martin - 2015 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (4):691-702.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-17

Downloads
13 (#1,042,339)

6 months
11 (#246,433)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references