Adaptation to a rotated visual field as a function of degree of optical tilt and exposure time

Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (5):629 (1966)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,682

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Some evidence for a comparator in adaptation to optical tilt.Sheldon M. Ebenholtz - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (1):94.
Readaptation and decay after exposure to optical tilt.Sheldon M. Ebenholtz - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 78 (2p1):350.
Transfer and decay functions in adaptation to optical tilt.Sheldon M. Ebenholtz - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 (1):170.
Transfer of adaptation to rotation of the visual field.Curtis W. McIntyre & Herbert L. Pick - 1974 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 103 (4):782.
Tilt adaptation and figural after-effect.Eric G. Heinemann & Thomas Marill - 1954 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 48 (6):468.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
18 (#851,175)

6 months
8 (#405,070)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Non-Visual Determinants of Perception.Arien Mack - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):75-76.
Insufficiencies in perceptual adaptation theory.Sheldon M. Ebenholtz - 1979 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2 (1):67-68.

View all 33 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references