Fair Subject Selection Procedures Must Consider Scientific Uncertainty and Variability in Risk and Benefit Perception

American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):33-35 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Volume 20, Issue 2, February 2020, Page 33-35.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,168

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Climate Projections and Uncertainty Communication.Susan L. Joslyn & Jared E. LeClerc - 2016 - Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (1):222-241.
Varieties of Risk Representations.John Kadvany - 1997 - Journal of Social Philosophy 28 (3):123-143.
Four Faces of Fair Subject Selection.Katherine Witte Saylor & Douglas MacKay - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):5-19.
Risk Limits in Fair Subject Selection.Robert Steel - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):30-32.
Luck, risk, and blame.Stale Fredriksen - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (5):535 – 553.
Risk, Precaution, and Emerging Technologies.Fritz Allhoff - 2009 - Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 3 (2).
Risk and medical ethics.E. Pochin - 1982 - Journal of Medical Ethics 8 (4):180-184.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-01-29

Downloads
18 (#835,422)

6 months
10 (#272,956)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Elise Smith
National Institutes of Health

References found in this work

Four Faces of Fair Subject Selection.Katherine Witte Saylor & Douglas MacKay - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (2):5-19.

Add more references