Theistic Panpsychic Communicative Rationality

Open Journal of Philosophy 1 (2):76 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The difference between a scientific system and the non scientific system is only a matter of forms of rationality: so also the difference between empirical system and non empirical system explainable in terms of the kinds of rationality systems in their structures. Similarly, the classification of civilized cultures and primitive cultures or the black civilization and western civilization is all about forms of rationalizations. That is because the form of explanation of European Society is different from the form of explanation of the Black African animistic society. However, structural functionalism is an attempt on a large scale to combine the methods of both functionalism and structuralism which is not only extant in African philosophy but also embedded in the practice of tradition. Indeed Theistic Panpsychic rationality is culturally structural and functional thereby qualifying to be described as structural functional Panpsychic communicative animism

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-29

Downloads
42 (#380,966)

6 months
5 (#648,432)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

African religions & philosophy.John S. Mbiti - 1990 - Portsmouth, N.H.: Heinemann.
Introduction.Richard J. Bernstein - 1971 - In Praxis and action. Philadelphia,: University of Pennsylvania Press. pp. 1-10.
Introduction.Richard J. Bernstein - 1986 - In Philosophical profiles: essays in a pragmatic mode. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire]: Polity Press in association with B. Blackwell, Oxford. pp. 1-20.

View all 9 references / Add more references