A Rational Model of Word Skipping in Reading: Ideal Integration of Visual and Linguistic Information

Topics in Cognitive Science 12 (1):387-401 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When we read, we do not fixate on each word! How does that work? By deep theory those sorts of decisions must be the result of complex decisions involving the specific “word,” the linguistic context in which it appears, and visual information. But is reading really all that difficult? After all, simple heuristics models of reading seem to do sort of okay by only considering the additive effects of word and context. Entropy measures do well at predicting word “skipping” and suggest that “word frequency” may play the dominant role in the “decision” to skip or not skip!

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The game of word skipping: Who are the competitors?Ralf Engbert & Reinhold Kliegl - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):481-482.
Eye movements in reading: Models and data.Keith Rayner, Alexander Pollatsek & Erik D. Reichle - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):507-518.
Beyond isolated word recognition.Simon P. Liversedge, Hazel I. Blythe & Denis Drieghe - 2012 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 35 (5):31-32.
Visual information and redundancy in reading.Muriel C. Thompson & Dominic W. Massaro - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (1):49.
About saccade generation in reading.Françoise Vitu - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (4):702-703.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-11

Downloads
10 (#1,217,101)

6 months
2 (#1,250,447)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?