Truth and Disagreement in Impassioned Belief

Analysis 75 (3):450-459 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/analys/anv025

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The unity of normative judgement: On Ridge’s Impassioned Belief.Karl Schafer - 2015 - Analysis 75 (3):460-471.
Replies to Dreier and McNaughton.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2008 - Philosophical Books 49 (3):218-228.
Assertion, Belief and Disagreement: A Problem for Truth-Relativism.Sebastiano Moruzzi - 2008 - In Manuel García-Carpintero & Max Kölbel (eds.), Relative Truth. Oxford University Press. pp. 207.
Review of Michael Ridge Impassioned Belief. [REVIEW]Andrew Alwood - 2014 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2014.
Belief, Truth and Radical Disagreement.Nicholas Unwin - 2016 - In Martin Grajner & Pedro Schmechtig (eds.), Epistemic Reasons, Norms and Goals. Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 117-136.
Review: Michael Ridge, Impassioned Belief. [REVIEW]Kevin Toh - 2016 - Ethics 126 (2):526-530.
Review: Michael Ridge, Impassioned Belief. [REVIEW]Review by: Kevin Toh - 2016 - Ethics 126 (2):526-530.
Moral Disagreement among Philosophers.Ralph Wedgwood - 2014 - In Michael Bergmann & Patrick Kain (eds.), Challenges to Moral and Religious Belief: Disagreement and Evolution. Oxford University Press. pp. 23-39.
Stoic disagreement and belief retention.Michael Rieppel - 2011 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (2):243-262.
Review of "Impassioned Belief". [REVIEW]Steven Ross - 2015 - Essays in Philosophy 16 (1):115-148.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-07-08

Downloads
93 (#188,721)

6 months
6 (#588,321)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

James Dreier
Brown University

Citations of this work

Hybrid Accounts of Ethical Thought and Talk.Teemu Toppinen - 2017 - In Tristram Colin McPherson & David Plunkett (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics. New York: Routledge. pp. 243-259.
Propositions First: Biting Geach's Bullet.M. J. Frápolli - 2019 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 86:87-110.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Being for: evaluating the semantic program of expressivism.Mark Andrew Schroeder - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Mark Schroeder.
The autonomy of ethics.A. N. Prior - 1960 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38 (3):199 – 206.
Believing in Expressivism.T. Toppinen - 2013 - Oxford Studies in Metaethics 8.

Add more references