Affine geometry, visual sensation, and preference for symmetry of things in a thing

Symmetry 127 (8) (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Evolution and geometry generate complexity in similar ways. Evolution drives natural selection while geometry may capture the logic of this selection and express it visually, in terms of specific generic properties representing some kind of advantage. Geometry is ideally suited for expressing the logic of evolutionary selection for symmetry, which is found in the shape curves of vein systems and other natural objects such as leaves, cell membranes, or tunnel systems built by ants. The topology and geometry of symmetry is controlled by numerical parameters, which act in analogy with a biological organism’s DNA. The introductory part of this paper reviews findings from experiments illustrating the critical role of two-dimensional (2D) design parameters, affine geometry and shape symmetry for visual or tactile shape sensation and perception-based decision making in populations of experts and non-experts. It will be shown that 2D fractal symmetry, referred to herein as the “symmetry of things in a thing”, results from principles very similar to those of affine projection. Results from experiments on aesthetic and visual preference judgments in response to 2D fractal trees with varying degrees of asymmetry are presented. In a first experiment (psychophysical scaling procedure), non-expert observers had to rate (on a scale from 0 to 10) the perceived beauty of a random series of 2D fractal trees with varying degrees of fractal symmetry. In a second experiment (two-alternative forced choice procedure), they had to express their preference for one of two shapes from the series. The shape pairs were presented successively in random order. Results show that the smallest possible fractal deviation from “symmetry of things in a thing” significantly reduces the perceived attractiveness of such shapes. The potential of future studies where different levels of complexity of fractal patterns are weighed against different degrees of symmetry is pointed out in the conclusion.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reasons for the preference for symmetry.Rolf Reber - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):415-416.
Brueckner and Fischer on the Evil of Death.Huiyuhl Yi - 2012 - Philosophia 40 (2):295-303.
Les brisures de symetrie du temps.Alexandre Laforgue - 1993 - Acta Biotheoretica 41 (1-2):105-117.
Les brisures de symetrie du temps.Alexandre Laforgue - 1994 - Acta Biotheoretica 42 (1):105-117.
Fundamental manifestations of symmetry in physics.Joe Rosen - 1990 - Foundations of Physics 20 (3):283-307.
What does facial symmetry reveal about health and personality?Domagoj Švegar - 2016 - Polish Psychological Bulletin 47 (3):356-365.
Philosophy of Symmetry.Sarukkai Sundar - 2004 - Shimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study.
Symmetry arguments in physics.Peter Kosso - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 30 (3):479-492.
Is symmetry of stone tools merely an epiphenomenon of similarity?J. B. Derēgowski - 2002 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 25 (3):406-407.
Symmetry as a method of proof.Eric Hammer - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (5):523 - 543.
Fractal geometry is not the geometry of nature.Orly R. Shenker - 1994 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 25 (6):967-981.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-14

Downloads
410 (#48,779)

6 months
94 (#48,860)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Birgitta Dresp-Langley
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique