Common sense, relativity and theories of time

Abstract

A-theories of time claim to best respect common sense, whereas B-theories of time typically eschew common sense and instead draw their inspiration from science, in particular relativity theory. For 100 years the battle lines have tended to be drawn over the existence of a universal present. Less prominently, but nevertheless well-known for the last 50 years, similar battle lines have been drawn over the possibility of closed time-like curves. In this battle A-theorists have argued that closed time-like curves are incompatible with common sense and hence are impossible. In this paper I show how A-theory can be reconciled with the existence of closed time-like curves, albeit with some theoretical loss. I argue, however, that given that A-theorists tend to also hold that time travel would entail restrictions on free will, they might actually welcome this particular theoretical loss.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,709

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Time travel and time machines.Chris Smeenk & Christian Wuthrich - 2011 - In Craig Callender (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 577-630.
Twins' Paradox and Closed Timelike Curves: The Role of Proper Time and the Presentist View on Spacetime.Cord Friebe - 2012 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 43 (2):313-326.
Common Sense.Michael De Medeiros - 2009 - Weigl Publishers.
The Minimal A-theory.Meghan Sullivan - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (2):149-174.
Becoming inflated.Craig Bourne - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (1):107-119.
On going backward in time.John Earman - 1967 - Philosophy of Science 34 (3):211-222.
Presentism and relativity. [REVIEW]Yuri Balashov & Michel Janssen - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (2):327-346.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-10-16

Downloads
22 (#706,230)

6 months
10 (#263,328)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Phil Dowe
Australian National University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references