The problem of animal pain: a theodicy for all creatures great and small

New York, NY: Palgrave-Macmillan (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The plan of this book -- The problem of animal pain -- The Bayesian argument from animal pain -- Is there really a problem? the challenge of neo-cartesianism -- There is a problem. the defeat of neo-cartesianism -- The saint-making theodicy I:Negative phase -- The saint-making theodicy II:Positive phase -- Animal saints -- Animal afterlife.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,227

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Theodicy and Animals.Joseph J. Lynch - 2002 - Between the Species 13 (2):4.
Do we Need a Plant Theodicy?Lloyd Strickland - 2021 - Scientia et Fides 9 (2):221-246.
The Analogical Argument for Animal Pain.Roy W. Perrett - 1997 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 14 (1):49-58.
Do Animals Feel Pain?Peter Harrison - 1991 - Philosophy 66 (255):25-40.
Animals, pain and morality.Alan Carter - 2005 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (1):17–22.
Justification of Animal Rights Claim.Azam Golam - 2009 - Philosophy and Progress 43 (2):139-152.
Do animals feel pain?Peter Singer - 1990 - In Peter. Singer (ed.), Animal Liberation. Avon Books.
Theodicy and Animal Pain.Peter Harrison - 1989 - Philosophy 64 (247):79 - 92.
Harrison on Animal Pain.Ian House - 1991 - Philosophy 66 (257):376 - 379.
Animals and Sociology.Kay Peggs - 2012 - Palgrave-Macmillan.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-12-16

Downloads
22 (#712,914)

6 months
10 (#276,350)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Trent Dougherty
University of Rochester (PhD)

Citations of this work

The possibility of resurrection by reassembly.Justin Mooney - 2018 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 84 (3):273-288.
The problem of evil and the suffering of creeping things.Dustin Crummett - 2017 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 82 (1):71-88.
Analyzing Sterba’s argument.Michael Tooley - 2020 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 87 (3):217-222.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references