Mythic Objects & Some Objects of Myth

American Journal of Semiotics 25 (1-2):53-76 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The views of myth advanced by Eliade, Jung, and Campbell are as flawed as they have been influential. Despite differences, all three concur in granting myth the status of a product of natural signification. The result is an obscurantist representation of myth, which in fact abets myth’s aim to represent itself as timeless, noncontingent, apolitical fact. Barthian analysis of myth exposes this aim by identifying its semiotic structure. This study applies that analysis to the myth of Pandora as an instance of how myth insinuates itself into ordinary signs in order to pass as elementary and also elemental truth.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,707

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

GILBERRT RYLE ON DESCARTES' MYTH.Desh Raj Sirswal - 2007 - K.U. Research Journal of Arts and Humanities (Jan.-Dec.2007):81-86.
Myth in myth.Robert L. Scranton - 1962 - In Thomas J. J. Altizer (ed.), Truth, myth, and symbol. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
Myth upon myth.Susan L. Hurley - 1996 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 96 (1):253-260.
Sellars vs. the given.Daniel Bonevac - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (1):1-30.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
15 (#968,256)

6 months
6 (#575,766)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references