Embryological models in ancient philosophy

Phronesis 50 (1):1 - 42 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Historically embryogenesis has been among the most philosophically intriguing phenomena. In this paper I focus on one aspect of biological development that was particularly perplexing to the ancients: self-organisation. For many ancients, the fact that an organism determines the important features of its own development required a special model for understanding how this was possible. This was especially true for Aristotle, Alexander, and Simplicius, who all looked to contemporary technology to supply that model. However, they did not all agree on what kind of device should be used. In this paper I explore the way these ancients made use of technology as a model for the developing embryo. I argue that their different choices of device reveal fundamental differences in the way each thinker understood the nature of biological development itself. In the final section of the paper I challenge the traditional view (dating back to Alexander's interpretation of Aristotle) that the use of automata in GA can simply be read off from their use in the de motu

Similar books and articles

Physical models and biological contexts.Margaret Morrison - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):324.
When scientific models represent.Daniela M. Bailer-Jones - 2003 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17 (1):59 – 74.
Diṅnāga and Mental Models: A Reconstruction.Amita Chatterjee & Smita Sirker - 2010 - Philosophy East and West 60 (3):315-340.
The organism in development.Robert C. Richardson - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):321.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
993 (#13,911)

6 months
164 (#19,903)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Soul's Tools.Jessica Gelber - 2020 - In Colin Guthrie King & Hynek Bartoš (eds.), Heat, pneuma and soul in ancient philosophy and science,. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 243-259.
Was Aristotle the ‘Father’ of the Epigenesis Doctrine?Ina Goy - 2018 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 40 (2):28.
Teleology Without Tears.Sylvia Berryman - 2007 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37 (3):351-369.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Functional analysis.Robert E. Cummins - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (November):741-64.
Philosophy of biological science.David L. Hull - 1974 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J.,: Prentice-Hall.

View all 20 references / Add more references