Why is language well designed for communication?

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (5):518-519 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Selection through iterated learning explains no more than other non-functional accounts, such as Universal Grammar (UG), why language is so well designed for communicative efficiency. It does not predict several distinctive features of language, such as central embedding, large lexicons, or the lack of iconicity, which seem to serve communication purposes at the expense of learnability

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,497

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Language, thought, and communication.Gilbert Harman - 1975 - Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7:270-298.
Cosmopolitan Communication and the Broken Dream of a Common Language.Niclas Rönnström - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 43 (3):260-282.
Language and thought.Christopher Gauker - 1999 - A Field Guide to the Philosophy of Mind.
In defense of public language.Ruth Garrett Millikan - 2003 - In Louise M. Antony & H. Hornstein (eds.), Chomsky and His Critics. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. pp. 215–237.
Communication and folk psychology.Richard Breheny - 2006 - Mind and Language 21 (1):74-107.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
35 (#460,468)

6 months
8 (#373,162)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?