Digital Design Research and Second-Order Cybernetics

Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):586-587 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Open peer commentary on the article “Design Research as a Variety of Second-Order Cybernetic Practice” by Ben Sweeting. Upshot: I claim that the parallels between design research, second-order cybernetics and second-order science, as discussed by Sweeting in the target article, are more explicit in digital design. The discussion of SOC and SOS can point towards the creation of an epistemological foundation to digital design, where self-reflexivity and the inclusion of the observer are central questions.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What Can Cybernetics Learn from Design?C. M. Herr - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):583-585.
Design Cycles: Conversing with Lawrence Halprin.T. Scholte - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):579-581.
Rigor in Research, Honesty and Values.M. Hohl - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):585-586.
Design Research as a Variety of Second-Order Cybernetic Practice.Ben Sweeting - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):572-579.
A Theatre for Exploring the Cybernetic.B. Sweeting - 2016 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (3):619-620.
Avoiding Violence by Design.A. O. Brightman - 2015 - Constructivist Foundations 11 (1):82-84.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-07-15

Downloads
17 (#895,795)

6 months
1 (#1,516,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references