Voodoo epistemology

Abstract

A critical examination of Alvin Plantinga's attempted defense against the dreaded "Great Pumpkin Objection" to his theistic-belief-as-properly-basic religious epistemology.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Recent Work in Reformed Epistemology.Andrew Moon - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (12):879-891.
Epistemology in philosophy of religion.Philip L. Quinn - 2002 - In Paul K. Moser (ed.), The Oxford handbook of epistemology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 513--538.
Warrant, defeaters, and the epistemic basis of religious belief.Christoph Jäger - 2005 - In Michael G. Parker and Thomas M. Schmidt (ed.), Scientific explanation and religious belief. Mohr Siebeck. pp. 81-98.
Basic Theistic Belief.Bredo C. Johnsen - 1986 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 16 (3):455 - 464.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
109 (#166,159)

6 months
1 (#1,516,001)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Keith DeRose
Yale University

Citations of this work

Recent Work in Reformed Epistemology.Andrew Moon - 2016 - Philosophy Compass 11 (12):879-891.
Reasons to Believe - Theoretical Arguments.Marcus Hunt - 2020 - In Beau Branson, Hans Van Eyghen, Marcus Hunt, Tim Knepper, Robert Sloan Lee & Steven Steyl (eds.), Introduction to Philosophy: Philosophy of Religion. Rebus Community Press. pp. 22-33.
Plantinga’s Reformed Epistemology: What’s the Question? [REVIEW]Deane-Peter Baker - 2004 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 57 (2):77-103.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references