Linguistics is Not a Good Model for Philosophy

Southern Journal of Philosophy 38 (S1):113-120 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,923

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Rethinking linguistics.Hayley G. Davis - 2003 - New York: RoutledgeCurzon. Edited by Talbot J. Taylor.
On linguistics in philosophy, and philosophy in linguistics.James Higginbotham - 2002 - Linguistics and Philosophy 25 (5-6):573-584.
Deleuze and language.Jean-Jacques Lecercle - 2002 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Good advice and rational action.Eric Wiland - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (3):561-569.
Whose good is the common good?Claus Offe - 2012 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (7):665-684.
A model theory for propositional attitudes.Richmond H. Thomason - 1980 - Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (1):47 - 70.
The concept of situation in linguistics.Claude Germain - 1979 - Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.
Extended axiomatic linguistics.James Dickins - 1998 - New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lexical functional grammar as a model of linguistic competence.Paul Schachter - 1985 - Linguistics and Philosophy 8 (4):449 - 503.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-09-14

Downloads
46 (#354,703)

6 months
7 (#489,614)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Michael DePaul
University of Notre Dame

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references