The effect of using differential end boxes in a simple T-maze learning situation

Journal of Experimental Psychology 38 (3):245 (1948)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0057592

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The effect of differential non-reinforcement of the incorrect response on the learning of the correct response in the simple T-maze.M. Ray Denny & Morton D. Dunham - 1951 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 41 (5):382.
Maze learning with a differential proprioceptive cue.L. F. Carter - 1936 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 19 (6):758.
An experimental investigation of the gradient of reinforcement in maze learning.M. E. Thompson - 1944 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 34 (5):390.
T-maze reversal following differential endbox placement.James R. Ison & David Birch - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (2):200.
Differential effects of shock in human maze learning.Samuel M. Feldman - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (2):171.
Reactive inhibition as a factor in maze learning: II. The role of reactive inhibition in studies of place learning versus response learning.Merrell E. Thompson & Jean P. Thompson - 1949 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (6):883.
The role of secondary reinforcement in a partial reinforcement learning situation.M. R. Denny - 1946 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 36 (5):373.
Studies in spatial learning. III. Two paths to the same location and two paths to two different locations.Benbow F. Ritchie - 1947 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 37 (1):25.
The distribution of muscular action potentials during maze learning.R. S. Daniel - 1939 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 24 (6):621.
Retention of T-maze learning after varying intervals following partial and continuous reinforcement.Winfred F. Hill, John W. Cotton, Norman E. Spear & Carl P. Duncan - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (3p1):584.
The specificity of the effect of shock for error in maze learning with human subjects.J. Bernard & R. W. Gilbert - 1941 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 28 (2):178.
The delay-of-reinforcement gradient in maze learning.J. P. Seward - 1942 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 30 (6):464.
An experimental study of the gradient of reinforcement in maze learning.G. R. Grice - 1942 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 30 (6):475.
The conception of the true path and efficiency in maze learning.A. Q. Sartain - 1940 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 26 (1):74.
Place versus response learning in the simple T-maze.Hugh C. Blodgett & Kenneth McCutchan - 1947 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 37 (5):412.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
16 (#908,545)

6 months
3 (#980,137)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references