Applying the feminist agrifood systems theory (fast) to U.S. organic, value-added, and non-organic non-value-added farms

Agriculture and Human Values 40 (3):1185-1204 (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The population of women farm operators continues to increase in the U.S. That growth, however, is mediated by research showing that women in agriculture experience persistent barriers to equality with men. The Feminist Agriculture Food Theory (FAST) developed by Sach et al. (The Rise of Women Farmers and Sustainable Agriculture, University of Iowa Press, Iowa City, (Sachs et al., The rise of women farmers and sustainable agriculture, University of Iowa Press, 2016) posits that in the face of these barriers, women farmers in the Northeast are engaging in six strategies to increase their success. These include (1) increasing gender equality on their farms, (2) asserting an identity as a farmer, (3) gaining greater access to resources, (4) shaping new food and farming systems, (5) negotiating roles in agricultural organizations, and (6) forming women-centered farming organizations. While researchers have applied FAST to Michigan, it has not been examined at a national level. In this paper, then, we use the 2017 Census of Agriculture Data to measure how women in agriculture in the U.S. are faring on each aspect of FAST we can measure (strategies 1–5). We compare women to men farmers across these FAST strategies and across three different farm types: Non-Organic Non-Value-Added Farms, Organic Farms, and Value-Added Farms. Our findings suggest for FAST strategies 1 and 2 there is an increase in equity and ability to identify as a farmer for women on organic and value-added farms. However, our findings also suggest that for FAST strategies that require more institutional and structural resources (I.e. strategies 3–5), inequities persist across farm types.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Books received. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2020 - Agriculture and Human Values 37 (2):513-514.
Books Received. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2022 - Agriculture and Human Values 39 (1):501-503.
Books received. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2021 - Agriculture and Human Values 38 (3):861-863.
Books received. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2020 - Agriculture and Human Values 37 (3):933-934.
Books received. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2022 - Agriculture and Human Values 39 (3):1165-1167.
Books received. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2022 - Agriculture and Human Values 39 (2):845-847.
Books received. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2021 - Agriculture and Human Values 38 (2):603-605.
Books received. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2021 - Agriculture and Human Values 38 (1):347-349.
Books received. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2020 - Agriculture and Human Values 37 (4):1323-1324.
Books received. [REVIEW][author unknown] - 2021 - Agriculture and Human Values 38 (4):1225-1227.
Concepts of Animal Health and Welfare in Organic Livestock Systems.Mette Vaarst & Hugo F. Alrøe - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (3):333-347.
Madeleine Fairbairn: Fields of gold: financing the global land rush.Carl Lewelling - 2022 - Agriculture and Human Values 39 (4):1509-1510.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-01-12

Downloads
14 (#995,492)

6 months
5 (#648,018)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations