The Discussions Regarding The Belonging of Qur’'nic Words in The Tradition of Tafsir and The Critique of Them

Kader 20 (1):345-368 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

When viewed the history of Islamic thought, it is seen that the scholars have made an effort to understand the nature of the speech of God and make sense of it. Essentially, understanding and grasping of the words of God are an effort to look from the physical realm to the metaphysical one. In spite of this fact, the scholars as the indomitable seekers of truth are in search of finding some clues to say about it. While some of them consider the “divine speech” as an attribute of God, many others view it as a divine act. It is also admitted by all of them that whether being attributive or act of God, the reflection of the divine speech is the Qur’ân. In this sense, three views have been put forward on the question of the belonging of the Qur’ânic words. According to the dominant and preferred point of view among these views, Qur’ân belongs to God in terms of wording and meaning. Accordingly, the revelation of the Qur’ân, which was revealed to the Prophet Mohammed consists of both wording and meaning. Therefore, there is no intervention or contribution of Gabriel or Muhammad in constituting of Qur’ân. According to the second approach, the meaning of Qur’ânic text belongs to God, however, its words pertain to Mohammed. This view signals that Gabriel revealed nothing more than the meanings of Qur’ân. Mohammed understands the meanings conveyed to him and then said them in Arabic expression patterns and phrases. According to the third approach, the meanings of Qur’ânic text belongs to God, however, its words pertain to Gabriel. In other words, only meanings of text were given to Gabriel, and its words are formed by him. In the present study, the mentioned approaches which are put forward by scholars about the belonging of Qur’ânic words will be examined in terms of the integrity of the Qur’ân and Tafsir rumors (riwâyât) of the classical period. In a nutshell, it can be said that there is no disagreement among scholars in the field of the belonging of the meanings of Qur’ânic text to God. The main disagreement is whether the Qur’ânic words belong to God, Gabriel or Muhammad. Considering the integrity of Qur’ân and Tafsir rumors regarding to the circumstances of sending down of the Qur’ânic revelation, it has been determined that the prevailing view is more consistent than the other two views.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,261

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mana: Yin and Yang.John Patterson - 2000 - Philosophy East and West 50 (2):229-241.
“Personal Opinion” in Qurʾānic Exegesis: Medieval Debates and Interpretations of al-Tafsīr bi-l-Raʾy.Alena Kulinich - 2022 - Der Islam: Journal of the History and Culture of the Middle East 99 (2):476-513.
Environmental Mana.John Patterson - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (3):267-276.
Environmental Mana.John Patterson - 1999 - Environmental Ethics 21 (3):267-276.
Hikmat-I Ilahi.Mahdi Ilahi Qamshah'I. - 1957 - Chapkhanah-I Danishgah.
Ṭawīl in Ibn Hazm's Understanding of Usūl.Rifat Yildiz - 2020 - Cumhuriyet İlahiyat Dergisi 24 (3):1199-1217.
Metodologi Tafsir Al-Qur'an (Dari Global Ke Komparatif).Tohis Reza Adeputra - 2023 - Al-Mustafid: Jurnal of Quran and Hadith Studies 2 (1):12-22.
Pratimā-Māna-LakṣaṇamPratima-Mana-Laksanam.Ananda K. Coomaraswamy & Phanindra Nath Bose - 1930 - Journal of the American Oriental Society 50:266.
Suicide: A Study of the Tafsīr.Emily Silkaitis - 2022 - Der Islam: Journal of the History and Culture of the Middle East 99 (1):63-96.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-09-25

Downloads
9 (#1,258,729)

6 months
4 (#798,951)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?