The harm of death, time-relative interests, and abortion

Philosophical Forum 38 (1):57–80 (2007)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Regarding the sinking lifeboat scenario involving several human beings and a dog, nearly everyone agrees that it is right to sacrifice the dog. I suggest that the best explanation for this considered judgment, an explanation that appears to time-relative interests, contains a key insight about prudential value. This insight, I argue, also provides perhaps the most promising reply to the future-like-ours argument, which is widely regarded as the strongest moral argument against abortion. Providing a solution to a longstanding puzzle in value theory across species while illuminating the morality of abortion, the time-relative interest account proves worthy of sustained theoretical attention

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,846

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Harm, Sharm, and One Extremely Creepy Argument.Kenneth Einar Himma - 2004 - Faith and Philosophy 21 (2):250-255.
Abortion, Time-Relative Interests, and Futures Like Ours.Peter Nichols - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):493-506.
The Metaphysics of death.John Martin Fischer (ed.) - 1993 - Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
Mortal harm.Steven Luper - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (227):239–251.
Death's Distinctive Harm.Stephan Blatti - 2012 - American Philosophical Quarterly 49 (4):317-30.
Defending double effect.Alison Hills - 2003 - Philosophical Studies 116 (2):133-152.
Killing and the Time-relative Interest Account.Nils Holtug - 2011 - The Journal of Ethics 15 (3):169-189.
Time-Relative Interests and Abortion.S. Liao - 2007 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 4 (2):242-256.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
169 (#114,351)

6 months
11 (#237,138)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

David DeGrazia
George Washington University

References found in this work

A defense of abortion.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 1971 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 (1):47-66.
Why abortion is immoral.Don Marquis - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):183-202.
Preference and urgency.T. M. Scanlon - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (19):655-669.
When did you first begin to feel it?John A. Burgess & S. A. Tawia - 1996 - Locating the Beginnings of Human Consciousness? Bioethics 10 (1):1-26.

View all 9 references / Add more references