The Ethics of Krabbe Newborn Screening

Public Health Ethics 6 (1):114-128 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The experience of newborn screening for Krabbe disease in New York State demonstrates the ethical problems that arise when screening programs are expanded in the absence of true understanding of the diseases involved. In its 5 years of testing and millions of dollars in costs, there have been very few benefits, and the testing has uncovered potential cases of late-onset disease that raise difficult ethical questions in their own right. For these reasons, we argue that Krabbe screening should only be continued as a research project that includes the informed consent of parents to the testing

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,829

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Toward a Realistic Assessment of PKU Screening.Diane B. Paul - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:322 - 328.
Predictive genetic testing for conditions that present in childhood.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (3):225-244.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-12-13

Downloads
77 (#215,512)

6 months
8 (#359,856)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Richard Dees
University of Rochester

References found in this work

Mandatory versus voluntary consent for newborn screening?Lainie Friedman Ross - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (4):299-328.
Single Payer Meets Managed Competition.David DeGrazia - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 38 (1):23-33.

Add more references