The Aesthetic Creation Theory of Art

Sztuka I Filozofia (Art and Philosophy) 35:20-24 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This is a critical discussion of Nick Zangwill’s Aesthetic Creation Theory of Art, as presented in his book Aesthetic Creation. The discussion focuses on two questions: first, whether the notion of art implied by Zangwill’s theory is at once too wide and too narrow; second, whether Zangwill is right about the persistence conditions of works of art.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Must Aesthetic Definitions of Art be Disjunctive?Jonathan Farrell - 2008 - American Society for Aesthetics Graduate E-Journal 1 (1):1-6.
Aesthetic creation.Nick Zangwill - 2007 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Aesthetic Creation.Daniel O. Nathan - 2008 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (4):416-418.
Aesthetic Creation – Nick Zangwill.Derek Matravers - 2009 - Philosophical Quarterly 59 (236):573-574.
Are there counterexamples to aesthetic theories of art?Nick Zangwill - 2002 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60 (2):111–118.
Against Aesthetic/Sensory Dependence.Jiri Benovsky - 2016 - Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 25 (51).
A Critique of Moderate Formalism.Simon Fokt - 2013 - Estetika: The European Journal of Aesthetics 50 (1):41-52.
Aesthetic Experts, Guides to Value.Dominic Mciver Lopes - 2015 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 73 (3):235-246.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-08-12

Downloads
932 (#15,464)

6 months
160 (#20,996)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rafael De Clercq
Lingnan University

Citations of this work

The Aesthetic Engagement Theory of Art.Patrick Grafton-Cardwell - 2021 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 8:243-268.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references