The Cooperation Argument for Fairness in International Trade

Journal of Social Philosophy 42 (2):192-218 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,674

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fairness in international economic cooperation: moving beyond Rawls’s duty of assistance.Sylvie Loriaux - 2012 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 15 (1):19-39.
A Theory of Fairness in Trade.Aaron James - 2014 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 1 (2):177-200.
Free Trade and the Environment.Nicole Hassoun - 2009 - Environmental Ethics 31 (1):51-66.
MHC-Mediated Benefits of Trade: A Biomolecular Approach to Cooperation in the Marketplace.Haim Ofek - 2013 - In Kim Sterelny, Richard Joyce, Brett Calcott & Ben Fraser (eds.), Cooperation and its Evolution. MIT Press. pp. 175.
Fairness in Technological Design.Cameron Shelley - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):663-680.
Stag Hunts and Committee Work: Cooperation and the Mutualistic Paradigm.Jay R. Elliott - 2011 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2 (2):245-260.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-06-02

Downloads
35 (#467,294)

6 months
9 (#349,017)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Helena De Bres
Wellesley College

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two concepts of rules.John Rawls - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (1):3-32.
The Problem of Global Justice.Thomas Nagel - 2005 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 33 (2):113-147.
Two concepts of rules.John Rawls & Andrei Korbut - 2013 - Russian Sociological Review 12 (2):16-40.
Distributive Justice without Sovereign Rule.Aaron James - 2005 - Social Theory and Practice 31 (4):533-559.
Equality in a Realistic Utopia.Aaron James - 2006 - Social Theory and Practice 32 (4):699-724.

Add more references