There are 2ℵ⚬ many almost strongly minimal generalized n-gons that do not interpret and infinite group

Journal of Symbolic Logic 63 (2):485 - 508 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Generalizedn-gons are certain geometric structures (incidence geometries) that generalize the concept of projective planes (the nontrivial generalized 3-gons are exactly the projective planes).In a simplified world, every generalizedn-gon of finite Morley rank would be an algebraic one, i.e., one of the three families described in [9] for example. To our horror, John Baldwin [2], using methods discovered by Hrushovski [7], constructed ℵ1-categorical projective planes which are not algebraic. The projective planes that Baldwin constructed fail to be algebraic in a dramatic way.Indeed, every algebraic projective plane over an algebraically closed field is Desarguesian [12]. In particular, an algebraically closed field (isomorphic to the base field) can be interpreted in every one of them. However, in the projective planes that Baldwin constructed, one cannot even interpret an infinite group.In this article we show that the same phenomenon occurs for the generalizedn-gons ifn≥ 3 is an odd integer. For each suchnwe constructmany nonisomorphic generalizedn-gons of finite Morley rank that do not interpret an infinite group. As one may expect, our method is inspired by Hrushovski and Baldwin, and we follow Baldwin's line of approach. Quite often our proofs are a verification of the fact that the proofs of Baldwin [2] forn= 3 carry over to an arbitrary positive odd integern(which is sometimes far from being obvious). As in [2], we begin by defining a certain collection of finite graphsK* and a binary relation ≤ on these graphs. We show that (K*, ≤) satisfies the amalgamation property.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,197

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

One theorem of Zil′ber's on strongly minimal sets.Steven Buechler - 1985 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (4):1054-1061.
Automorphism groups of trivial strongly minimal structures.Thomas Blossier - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (2):644-668.
Pseudoprojective strongly minimal sets are locally projective.Steven Buechler - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (4):1184-1194.
Minimal groups in separably closed fields.E. Bouscaren & F. Delon - 2002 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 67 (1):239-259.
Fusion over Sublanguages.Assaf Hasson & Martin Hils - 2006 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 71 (2):361 - 398.
Generalized fitting subgroup of a group of finite Morley rank.Ali Nesin - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (4):1391-1399.
Quasi-o-minimal structures.Oleg Belegradek, Ya'acov Peterzil & Frank Wagner - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (3):1115-1132.
Abelian groups with modular generic.James Loveys - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (1):250-259.
A note on the model theory of generalized polygons.Katrin Tent - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (2):692-702.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#410,346)

6 months
7 (#437,422)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Ab initio generic structures which are superstable but not ω-stable.Koichiro Ikeda - 2012 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 51 (1):203-211.

Add more citations

References found in this work

A new strongly minimal set.Ehud Hrushovski - 1993 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 62 (2):147-166.

Add more references