Justice and the Inclusion of Women in Clinical Studies: An Argument for Further Reform

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 4 (2):117-146 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Our society's practice of inadequately representing women as subjects of clinical research is unjust, not only because it results in inequalities in the quality and availability of care that have a detrimental impact on women's health, but also because it is linked to women's oppression. Although recent policy changes help to resolve the problems, more must be done. Additional remedies for the injustices of our society's research practices are proposed.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,471

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Why women must guard and rule in Plato's kallipolis.Catherine Mckeen - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):527–548.
The perils of protection: vulnerability and women in clinical research.Toby Schonfeld - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (3):189-206.
Pursuing Reform in Clinical Research: Lessons from Women's Experience.Lisa A. Eckenwiler - 1999 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 27 (2):158-170.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
39 (#412,147)

6 months
8 (#373,029)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Debra Debruin
University of Minnesota

Citations of this work

Distributive Epistemic Justice in Science.Gürol Irzik & Faik Kurtulmus - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Whatever Happened to Human Experimentation?Carl Elliott - 2015 - Hastings Center Report 46 (1):8-11.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references