How Molecules Became Signs

Biosemiotics:1-23 (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

To explore how molecules became signs I will ask: “What sort of process is necessary and sufficient to treat a molecule as a sign?” This requires focusing on the interpreting system and its interpretive competence. To avoid assuming any properties that need to be explained I develop what I consider to be a simplest possible molecular model system which only assumes known physics and chemistry but nevertheless exemplifies the interpretive properties of interest. Three progressively more complex variants of this model of interpretive competence are developed that roughly parallel an icon-index-symbol hierarchic scaffolding logic. The implication of this analysis is a reversal of the current dogma of molecular and evolutionary biology which treats molecules like DNA and RNA as the original sources of biological information. Instead I argue that the structural characteristics of these molecules have provided semiotic affordances that the interpretive dynamics of viruses and cells have taken advantage of. These molecules are not the source of biological information but are instead semiotic artifacts onto which dynamical functional constraints have been progressively offloaded during the course of evolution.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,610

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Peirce's Basic Classes of Signs in a Somewhat Different Vein.Floyd Merrel - 2000 - The Commens Encyclopedia: The Digital Encyclopedia of Peirce Studies.
Semiotic foundations of the study of pictures.Winfried Nöth - 2003 - Sign Systems Studies 31 (2):377-391.
On the blankness of blank-signs.Jun Wang - 2021 - Semiotica 2021 (242):123-139.
Philosophical Foundations of Stereochemistry.Hirofumi Ochiai - 2015 - Hyle: International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry 21 (1):1-18.
The Classifications of Signs : 1903.Anne Freadman - 2001 - The Commens Encyclopedia: The Digital Encyclopedia of Peirce Studies.
Peirce’s Concept of Sign. [REVIEW]B. O. G. - 1975 - Review of Metaphysics 28 (4):753-754.
The atom in a molecule as a mereological construct in chemistry.N. Sukumar - 2012 - Foundations of Chemistry 15 (3):303-309.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-09-28

Downloads
37 (#428,610)

6 months
14 (#175,908)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Terrence W. Deacon
University of California, Berkeley

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references