- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Ordinary reasonable care is not the minimum for engineers
Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):286-290 (2001)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
How 'Decent' Is a Decent Minimum of Health Care?R. T. Meulen - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (6):612-623.
Reasonable Care: Equality as Objectivity. [REVIEW]Avihay Dorfman - 2012 - Law and Philosophy 31 (4):369-407.
Reasonable care? Some comments on Gillett's reasonable care.Roger Crisp - 1994 - Bioethics 8 (2):159–167.
Why Treat Noncompliant Patients? Beyond the Decent Minimum Account.N. Eyal - 2011 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 36 (6):572-588.
Better communication between engineers and managers: Some ways to prevent many ethically hard choices.Michael Davis - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):171-212.
The ethical impacts of managed care.George W. Rimler & Richard D. Morrison - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (6):493 - 501.
Vagueness and Pointless Evil.Michael Schrynemakers - 2006 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 80:245-254.
Response to "ordinary reasonable care is not the minimum for engineers" (m. davis).Michael S. Pritchard - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):291-297.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
28 (#574,430)
6 months
2 (#1,206,551)
2009-01-28
Downloads
28 (#574,430)
6 months
2 (#1,206,551)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Response to "ordinary reasonable care is not the minimum for engineers" (m. davis).Michael S. Pritchard - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):291-297.
Response to "ordinary reasonable care is not the minimum for engineers" (M. Davis).Professor Michael S. Pritchard - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):291-297.
The myth of minimums: Response to “ordinary reasonable care is not the minimum for engineers”.Patricia H. Werhane - 2001 - Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2):298-302.
References found in this work
Engineering ethics: concepts and cases.Charles Edwin Harris, Michael S. Pritchard & Michael Jerome Rabins - 2009 - Boston, MA: Cengage. Edited by Michael S. Pritchard, Ray W. James, Elaine E. Englehardt & Michael J. Rabins.
Professional Responsibility.Michael Davis - 1999 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 18 (1):65-87.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c88c7cdf7-qczmr uwo