Groups, Communities, and Contested Identities in Genetic Research

Hastings Center Report 30 (6):38-45 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Obtaining community consent before conducting genetic research seems to be a way of ensuring that a whole community is not harmed against its wishes—that all Jews, or all African Americans, or all Hutterites are not forced to learn things about themselves they would rather not know, or are not forced into identities they would rather not have. Unfortunately, there are insurmountable problems both in identifying the right representatives of the community and in obtaining their consent.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,654

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Protecting groups from genetic research.Daniel Hausman - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (3):157–165.
Alain Locke and community.Leonard Harris - 1997 - The Journal of Ethics 1 (3):239-247.
P-compatible Abelian groups.Krystyna Mruczek-Nasieniewska - 2005 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 14 (2):253-263.
Genetic modifications for personal enhancement: a defense.Timothy F. Murphy - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics (4):2012-101026.
The nature of virtual communities.Daniel Memmi - 2006 - AI and Society 20 (3):288-300.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-11-22

Downloads
25 (#646,442)

6 months
8 (#399,931)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?