Comments on Keith Ward’s Christ and the Cosmos

Philosophia Christi 18 (2):307-312 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The present essay is a response to Keith Ward’s recent book, Christ and the Cosmos. While deeply appreciative of this fine book, I raise two criticisms of it: Ward’s claim that we can know nothing of the divine essence has disturbing implications, the main one of which is that there may be large disjunctions between what God has revealed to us about the divine nature and the divine nature in itself. Ward’s criticisms of the social theory of the Trinity are not compelling and indeed edge his own view close to modalism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,758

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Responses to Essays on Christ and the Cosmos.Keith Ward - 2016 - Philosophia Christi 18 (2):387-391.
Response to Keith Ward, Christ and the Cosmos.Richard Swinburne - 2016 - Philosophia Christi 18 (2):297-305.
Reply to Critics.Theodore M. Drange - 2005 - Philo 8 (2):169-182.
Christ and the Cosmos. [REVIEW]J. F. Bonnefoy - 1966 - Philosophical Studies (Dublin) 15:315-315.
Where has God gone?Keith Ward - 2003 - The Philosophers' Magazine 22:19-20.
Booknotes.Keith Ward - 1982 - Philosophy 57 (222):567-568.
Booknotes.Keith Ward - 1976 - Philosophy 51:121.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-11-10

Downloads
14 (#1,013,416)

6 months
7 (#484,016)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references