Commentary: Neonatal Viability in the 1990s: Held Hostage by Technology

Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (2):170-172 (1999)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article is a thoughtful and well written examination of some of the complex issues that have emerged as a result of recent improvements in the treatment of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants, including those who weigh 500 to 600 grams or who are believed to be 23 to 24 weeks gestation. The authors argue that the 23 to 24 week gestation period is filled with ambiguity and flexibility in practice relative to active resuscitation. However, such ambiguity and flexibility is likely to prevail whatever the boundary conditions of viability happen to be. Thus moral guidelines that inform the rescue of an infant believed to be 500 to 600 grams or 23 or 24 weeks gestation are likely to be relevant whatever the boundary conditions are

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,347

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A dao of technology?Barry Allen - 2010 - Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9 (2):151-160.
A Dutch report on the ethics of neonatal care: a commentary.R. Rivers - 1995 - Journal of Medical Ethics 21 (1):17-18.
Viability explanation.Arno Wouters - 1995 - Biology and Philosophy 10 (4):435-457.
Commentary: Weighing the Balance.Amnon Goldworth - 2010 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (3):415-416.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
57 (#282,933)

6 months
4 (#798,558)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references