- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The ClarivateTM Analytics acquisition of Publons – an evolution or commodification of peer review?
Research Ethics 15 (3-4):1-11 (2017)
Abstract
Without peer reviewers, the entire scholarly publishing system as we currently know it would collapse. However, as it currently stands, publishing is an extremely exploitative system, relative to o...Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
Death of a reviewer or death of peer review integrity? the challenges of using AI tools in peer reviewing and the need to go beyond publishing policies.Vasiliki Mollaki - 2024 - Research Ethics 20 (2):239-250.
The Peer review process in asia.Sakir Ahmed & Benzeeta Pinto - 2021 - Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics 1 (2):136-141.
Quality Peer review is essential for scholarly publishing.Ilke Coskun Benlidayi - 2022 - Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics 3 (1):79-81.
Characteristics of ‘mega’ peer-reviewers.David Moher, Andrea C. Tricco, Justin Presseau, Ba’ Pham & Danielle B. Rice - 2022 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 7 (1).
It Is Time to Re-Evaluate the Peer Review Process for Preclinical Research.Rajat Bhattacharya & Lee M. Ellis - 2018 - Bioessays 40 (1):1700185.
Motivating and Maintaining Ethics, Equity, Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Expertise in Peer Review.Adam Craig, Christina Lee, Nithyaa Bala & Carl Taswell - 2022 - Brainiacs Journal 3 (1):I5B147D9D.
Should Authors be Requested to Suggest Peer Reviewers?Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva & Aceil Al-Khatib - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (1):275-285.
Should Authors be Requested to Suggest Peer Reviewers?Aceil Al-Khatib & Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (1):275-285.
Peer review: types, pitfalls and controversies.Wilfred C. G. Peh - 2024 - Bangladesh Journal of Bioethics 15 (1):9-15.
Editorial Work and the Peer Review Economy of STS Journals.Maria Amuchastegui, Kean Birch & Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner - 2022 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 47 (4):670-697.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-11-10
Downloads
34 (#484,550)
6 months
5 (#710,905)
2017-11-10
Downloads
34 (#484,550)
6 months
5 (#710,905)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Should Acknowledgments in Published Academic Articles Include Gratitude for Reviewers Who Reviewed for Journals that Rejected Those Articles?Joona Räsänen & Pekka Louhiala - 2021 - Theoria 87 (3):713-728.
A Synthesis of the Formats for Correcting Erroneous and Fraudulent Academic Literature, and Associated Challenges.Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva - 2022 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 53 (4):583-599.
References found in this work
Recruitment of reviewers is becoming harder at some journals: a test of the influence of reviewer fatigue at six journals in ecology and evolution.Timothy H. Vines, Arianne Y. K. Albert & Charles W. Fox - 2017 - Research Integrity and Peer Review 2 (1).
Free editors and peers: squeezing the lemon dry.Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva & Vedran Katavić - 2016 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 6 (3-4).
Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections.Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva, Aceil Al-Khatib, Vedran Katavić & Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1347-1365.
Establishing Sensible and Practical Guidelines for Desk Rejections.Helmar Bornemann-Cimenti, Vedran Katavić, Aceil Al-Khatib & Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1347-1365.
Clarivate Analytics: Continued Omnia vanitas Impact Factor Culture.Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva & Sylvain Bernès - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (1):291-297.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-84dbcd7b48-6wlqx uwo