Phenomenology of the event: Waiting and surprise

Hypatia 15 (4):178-189 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

How, asks Françoise Dastur, can philosophy account for the sudden happening and the factuality of the event? Dastur asks how phenomenology, in particular the work of Heidegger, Husserl, and Merleau-Ponty, may be interpreted as offering such an account. She argues that the "paradoxical capacity of expecting surprise is always in question in phenomenology," and for this reason, she concludes, "We should not oppose phenomenology and the thinking of the event. We should connect them; openness to phenomena must be identified with openness to unpredictability." The article offers reflections in these terms on a phenomenology of birth

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,953

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
417 (#49,639)

6 months
9 (#355,912)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

References found in this work

The Visible and the Invisible: Followed by Working Notes.Maurice Merleau-Ponty - 1968 - Evanston [Ill.]: Northwestern University Press. Edited by Claude Lefort.
Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Logical investigations.Edmund Husserl - 2000 - New York: Routledge. Edited by Dermot Moran.

View all 26 references / Add more references