Is there ever an obligation to commit welfare fraud?

Journal of Value Inquiry 42 (3):377-387 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

All things considered, there are many public assistance recipients for whom there are compelling moral reasons to engage in welfare fraud. For many people, failure to defraud the welfare system, should they find themselves in a position to do so with impunity, would constitute a serious moral offense. This conclusion seems to fly in the face of prevailing notions of common sense. But this is misleading, since it is at the same time implied by principles that are widely embraced, assuming a set of circumstances that can be readily shown to obtain in many cases. Under that set of circumstances, and given our affirmation of certain basic moral convictions, we cannot consistently blame the practitioner of welfare fraud, or excuse, without special justifications, the legal conformist.

Similar books and articles

The sciences of animal welfare.David J. Mellor - 2009 - Ames, Iowa: Wiley-Blackwell. Edited by Emily Patterson-Kane & Kevin J. Stafford.
Fellow Citizenship and U.S. Welfare Policy.Steven Daskal - 2008 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):281-301.
In support of fraud trials without a jury.Sally Serena Ramage - 2005 - The Criminal Lawyer 156 (156):1-176.
Process and detection in fraud and deceit.Sam Silverman - 1994 - Ethics and Behavior 4 (3):219 – 228.
Unconditional welfare benefits and the principle of reciprocity.Shlomi Segall - 2005 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 4 (3):331-354.
Defining and Understanding fraud: A South African Case Study.G. J. Rossouw - 2000 - Business Ethics Quarterly 10 (4):885-895.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
246 (#82,435)

6 months
72 (#66,396)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen D'Arcy
Huron University At Western

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references