Using working memory theory to investigate the construct validity of multiple-choice reading comprehension tests such as the SAT

Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130 (2):208 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,440

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What do working memory span tasks like reading span really measure.Meredyth Daneman & Brenda Hannon - 2007 - In Naoyuki Osaka, Robert H. Logie & Mark D'Esposito (eds.), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory. Oxford University Press. pp. 21--42.
What do working memory span tasks like reading span really measure?Meredyth Daneman & Hannon & Brenda - 2007 - In Naoyuki Osaka, Robert H. Logie & Mark D'Esposito (eds.), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory. Oxford University Press.
Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension.David Caplan & Gloria S. Waters - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):77-94.
Working memory and sentence comprehension: Whose burden of proof?Arthur Wingfield - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):113-114.
Problems with plausibility and alternatives to working memory.Neal J. Pearlmutter - 1999 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (1):109-109.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-03-20

Downloads
40 (#401,457)

6 months
8 (#372,793)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations